Let’s start with the obvious: Smartwatches are the ultimate Trojan horse. They came for our wrists with promises of better health, improved productivity, and notifications that make us look important. What they didn’t tell us is that the wristbands hugging our sweaty arms are laced with forever chemicals—PFAS, to be precise. Yup, those delightful synthetic compounds that refuse to break down and, oh, may cause a range of health issues, including liver problems and endocrine disruption. Festive, right?
A study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters has confirmed our worst fears (or, let’s be honest, our mildest inconveniences). Some smartwatch and fitness tracker bands, particularly the bougie ones made from fluoroelastomers, are absolutely packed with PFAS, including perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA). So, the more money you drop on a watchband, the more likely it is to come with a side of chemical exposure. How’s that for luxury?
PFAS: What Are They, and Why Are They Ruining Everything?
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are nicknamed “forever chemicals” because they are stubborn little molecules that resist breaking down in the environment—or in your body. They’re like that one guest who overstays their welcome, except instead of eating your snacks, they bioaccumulate in your blood. PFHxA, the specific flavor of PFAS most commonly found in smartwatch bands, has been linked to liver, developmental, and endocrine issues, though the Environmental Protection Agency (bless their optimism) hasn’t found evidence tying it to cancer.
But wait! Don’t freak out just yet. Experts say it’s unclear how much PFAS actually leaches into your skin from these watchbands. Your skin is, after all, a pretty solid barrier. Or so we hope.
Why Are PFAS Even in Smartwatch Bands?
The answer is simple: fluoroelastomers. These are synthetic rubbers prized for being durable, heat-resistant, and—ironically enough—skin-friendly. Apple, for example, has made no secret of its use of fluoroelastomers in its watchbands, going so far as to boast about them in marketing materials. The next time you’re admiring your fancy strap’s minimalist chic, just remember it’s brought to you by the same class of chemicals found in firefighting foam and nonstick pans. Bon appétit.
Fluoroelastomers help make bands sweat-resistant and easy to clean, but apparently no one thought to ask whether having a toxic chemical cocktail strapped to your pulse point was a solid tradeoff.
Expensive Bands = More PFAS?
Here’s a fun twist: The study found that pricier wristbands—those over $30—contained more PFAS than cheaper ones. So, not only are you paying a premium to track your steps, heart rate, and “stress levels” (ha!), you’re also getting an extra dose of chemical exposure. Congratulations, you played yourself.
If you’re one of those people who splurges on luxury smartwatch accessories, this is your wake-up call. Turns out, the Dollar Store silicone band might be the real MVP.
Is This Actually Dangerous, or Are We Just Fear-Mongering?
Now, before you throw your smartwatch into the nearest river (please don’t; the PFAS will just end up in someone’s drinking water), let’s break down the risks.
Experts are divided on how concerned you should be. Dr. Kelly Johnson-Arbor, a toxicologist, notes that intact skin is a pretty good barrier against toxins, so you’re not likely to absorb a significant amount of PFAS from your band. Similarly, dermatologist Dr. Ife Rodney doubts that enough of the chemical gets into your system to cause measurable side effects. However, Graham Peaslee, one of the study’s co-authors, points out that some PFAS can migrate into the dermis and even enter the bloodstream over time. So, while the jury’s still out, the potential for harm exists.
It’s worth noting that the researchers chemically extracted PFAS from the watchbands rather than simulating real-world conditions, like sweat or prolonged wear. In other words, the amount of PFAS you’re exposed to while wearing a band might be significantly less than what’s in the material. Still, the fact that PFAS are even there is cause for side-eye.
What Can You Do? (Besides Panic)
If you’re now staring suspiciously at your wrist, wondering if your fitness tracker is plotting your demise, take a deep breath. Here are some steps you can take to minimize your exposure:
- Switch to Silicone: Nonfluorinated silicone bands are a safer option, and they’re often cheaper. Win-win.
- Replace Worn Bands: If your band is starting to degrade, it might be shedding more chemicals. Consider swapping it out for a new one.
- Don’t Lick Your Watchband: This should go without saying, but in case it doesn’t: Please don’t ingest your smartwatch. Just... don’t.
- Be Aware of Cumulative Exposure: PFAS are everywhere—food packaging, water, cosmetics—so minimizing exposure from one source is still a step in the right direction.
A Few Final Snarky Thoughts
Let’s face it: Most of us are still going to wear our smartwatches. After all, how else will we passive-aggressively compete with coworkers over step counts or ignore phone calls in meetings with a casual wrist glance? But the PFAS revelation is a reminder that convenience often comes at a cost. Whether it’s privacy concerns, environmental impact, or, in this case, potential chemical exposure, there’s always a catch.
The tech industry loves to sell us the illusion of progress while quietly cutting corners on safety and sustainability. Sure, it’s great that your smartwatch can tell you the weather and track your REM cycles, but maybe it’s time for manufacturers to focus on making products that don’t poison us. Just a thought.
Until then, I’ll be over here, debating whether it’s worth risking my liver for the privilege of tracking my mediocre sleep patterns. Spoiler: It probably is.
Get 16% Off